
On The Cricket Pitch
Technology changing face of international cricket

Philip Hackett
Wednesday, June 29, 2005
International cricket is poised for yet another dramatic change to playing
conditions as the ICC has given the green light to the use of football-style
substitutes in cricket.
The innovation will only affect one-day international matches, but it has
the potential to revolutionise the manner in which teams devise their strategy
in the shortened form of the game.
Test cricket is also likely to see dynamic changes as the ICC seeks to
utilise available technology in an effort to help umpires make more accurate
decisions.
While the West Indies Cricket Board and the West Indies Players Association
were involved in their latest industrial stand-off that has plunged regional
cricket further into the mire, the Chief Executives’ Committee (CEC) was
involved in a two day meeting at Lord’s Cricket Ground on Friday and Saturday.
It was part of a series of meetings that also included the ICC Annual
Conference and the ICC Cricket Business Forum.
The Cayman Islands was represented by Technical Director, Theo Cuffy, and
President of the local association, Chief Inspector Courtney Myles. The series
of meetings ended yesterday.
The CEC approved the introduction of two innovations into all one-day
internationals from 30 July. The new regulations, which involve the fielding
restrictions and the introduction of replacement players, will be used on a
trial basis for ten months, after which they will be reviewed by the cricket
committee next year. It was the cricket committee, chaired by former Indian
batsman Sunil Gavaskar, which made the initial recommendations.
Under the new plan, fielding restrictions will now be in place for 20 overs
rather than 15. The restrictions that now apply over the first 15 overs will
go into effect for the first ten and then two further blocks of five each, to
be determined by the captain of the fielding side. However the additional
‘close catcher’ field restriction will only be used in the first ten overs.
The CEC also approved the introduction of substitutes that will allow teams
to replace a player at any stage of a match. The replaced player will take no
further part in the match while the replacement will be entitled to assume any
remaining batting or bowling duties. Both players will be given credit for
having played a full international match.
The technology trial will be tested in the Super Series in Australia in
October. This will allow on-field umpires to consult with the TV umpire on any
aspect of any decision with the final decision remaining with the on-field
umpire.
The only exceptions to this will be line decisions, which will be dealt
with by the TV umpire in the same manner as at present, and clean catches,
where the existing process will also be retained. The current practice for
clean catches is that they are only referred where both umpires are unsighted
as this is one area where TV replays have been inconclusive.
Some critics will frown on these changes as they did when one day
international cricket, night cricket, the white ball, coloured clothing and
other major ideas were first introduced, but I am happy to see the ICC making
the effort to maintain freshness in cricket through thoughtful measures
designed to create interest and excitement. It may be necessary to make
modifications as these innovations are monitored, but the ICC should not be
intimidated by those reluctant to embrace change, which is an inevitable part
of life.
Locally the Cayman Islands Cricket Association has also been trying to
instil new life in the domestic league. The loss of the Nation’s Cup was
regrettable, but there has been an encouraging response to the division two
Twenty20 competition. A six-a-side tournament is also being planned for this
coming weekend.
If we expect cricket in the Cayman Islands to grow through the involvement
of young players it is important the image of the game is protected,
particularly at the highest level.
I am not aware of any players from Police or the Village Greenies who have
faced disciplinary action since my involvement with local cricket. That is the
reason why I enjoy watching these two clubs and can recommend my students do
the same. Cricket is not only about winning and losing, but character
building. I commend these two Division one clubs for their fine sportsmanship.
Hopefully they will continue to maintain these high standards on and off the
field.
It is also pleasing to note that since the introduction of the new Code of
Conduct only one second-division club has been penalised for bringing the game
into disrepute.
Players and clubs will have grievances from time to time but in addressing
these they will be expected to display a level of maturity consistent with
adulthood and the gentlemanly nature of the sport of cricket. It is
unfortunate when cricketers at any level travel the world competing yet seem
to learn so little about decorum and deportment.
Players should realise that complaints will often be better received and
acted upon if accompanied by a constructive suggestion for improvement that
does not only promote self interest. It is critical to the development of our
cricket that we all see the big picture. We become non-productive when
consumed with trivialities. Disruptive behaviour is a serious affront to
sponsors.
The introduction of The Code of Conduct has been a positive aspect of our
development, but the process is time consuming, especially for those
volunteering to adjudicate. I believe it is time for the match referee to be
introduced. Only two will be required on any one match day on Grand Cayman,
and judicious use of their powers could help the association avoid lengthy
hearings and paperwork.
Hopefully this system would ensure we never reach the stage where we need
the presence of security personnel at matches to monitor player behaviour and
protect spectators from being harassed.
Back...

|